Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 64.2 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 178 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 589 57% 468 Pts	64-Core 1,329 82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.5% Very good	Lighting 96.3 Reflection 101 Parallax 155 78% 118 fps	MRender 85.7 Gravity 103 Splatting 72.1 70% 86.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 402GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 997 947 986 996 998 1010 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,236 Write 990 Mixed 701 SusWrite 989 219% 979 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 42.6 146% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 601 DQ Write 393 DQ Mixed 446 346% 480 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 283%
WD WD4000FYYZ-5 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 75GB free Firmware: KF06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 120 125 125 125 124 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 120 Write 117 Mixed 75 SusWrite 124 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.77 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 82GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 19.4 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16