Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 177 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 586 58% 475 Pts	64-Core 1,325 82% 1,325 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.8% Very good	Lighting 97.3 Reflection 105 Parallax 148 79% 117 fps	MRender 87.3 Gravity 106 Splatting 75 72% 89.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 993 969 970 971 970 972 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,164 Write 950 Mixed 678 SusWrite 974 211% 942 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 38.9 127% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 576 DQ Write 401 DQ Mixed 449 346% 475 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 283%
WD WD4000FYYZ-5 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 65GB free Firmware: KF06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 125 125 124 124 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 117 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 123 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.72 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 82GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 19.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16