Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 14:06
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 817
80% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Zotac(19DA 3510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 160
Parallax 164
132% 162 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 141
Splatting 120
116% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
644GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 373
Mixed 350
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 41
144% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 148
157% 263 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
545GB free
Firmware: 0304
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.6
Write 15
Mixed 27.9
19% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
163% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
4TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 92.3
Mixed 68.5
111% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.7
264% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 65%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
195GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.8
Write 36.4
Mixed 27.2
42% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
435GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.2
Write 61.5
Mixed 42.6
69% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 42%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
740GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40.5
Write 41
Mixed 29.7
47% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 64%
WD My Passport 0829 2TB
45GB free, PID 0829
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.6
Write 35.4
Mixed 30
43% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 42%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
562GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.2
Write 27.6
Mixed 24.9
36% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 42%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
8GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40
Write 40.5
Mixed 28.2
46% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 23.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB Builds (Compare 1,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback