AWOW PC BOX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAWOW PC BOX  (all builds)
MotherboardAWOW PC BOX
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200306
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 12:56
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 28.7
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 61.8
25% 42.9 Pts
4-Core 95.1
8-Core 110
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 1.1
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 247 194 286 271 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 345
Write 316
Mixed 258
SusWrite 265
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 14.6
60% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 35
62% 123 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
138GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 83 86 85 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 36.5
Write 56.1
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 80.8
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 71%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
5GB free, PID 0023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.2 4.8 4.9 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 5.3
10% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 5%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
8GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 11 11 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 103
Write 24
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 11.4
34% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 20%
Ut165 USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.9 8.5 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 6
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 10.1
11% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 262
15% 262 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC BOX Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: AWOW PC BOX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback