Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 10:13
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 145
52% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 638
55% 473 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.5% Very good
Lighting 91.8
Reflection 91
Parallax 84.6
75% 89.1 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 72.6
71% 89 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,029
Write 3,539
Mixed 4,613
1,047% 4,727 MB/s
4K Read 263
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 176
712% 202 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 689
521% 704 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Freenas iSCSI Disk 5.5TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 45 52 87 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 77
Write 79.2
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 63.4
16% 71 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 9.4
33% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 61
DQ Mixed 199
114% 113 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 33.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback