Asrock Z68M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 19:42
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 344
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 61.4
53% 64.5 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 60.9
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 417 430 436 440 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 450
Write 439
Mixed 358
SusWrite 406
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 30.4
99% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 251
218% 325 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 111 114 115 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 123
Write 115
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 111
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 83%
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 2TB
1TB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 153 158 160 159 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 188
Write 122
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 156
174% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 57%
Inateck 1TB
619GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 125 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 284
Write 176
Mixed 206
SusWrite 125
250% 198 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 20
1,499% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 26.6
2,068% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 141%
Great: 300%
WD My Passport 25EA 4TB
3TB free, PID 25ea
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 20.1
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 58%
WD My Book 500GB
221GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 21.4
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 20.4
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68M/USB3 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z68M/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback