Intel W2600CR

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Intel W2600CR (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131223
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	May 24 '17 at 09:33
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 469 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 44.5 1-Core 69.8 2-Core 139 46% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 555 49% 417 Pts	64-Core 554 34% 554 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gainward(10B0 1401) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 44.3 Parallax 39.6 37% 43 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 36.5 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128 128GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 25256 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 49 (B1) Unknown 98 98 98 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 62 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3607945842 (F2) Unknown 99 99 786494766	51.8% Above average	Read 265 Write 114 Mixed 165 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 14.5 96% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 26.1 52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 76%
Samsung MZ7TE128 128GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 11GB free Firmware: 100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25252 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 49 (B1) Unknown 99 99 99 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 62 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 29 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2369399184 (F2) Unknown 99 99 561762137	53.1% Above average	Read 261 Write 132 Mixed 183 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 14.5 97% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 25.4 52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 119GB free Firmware: A750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 79 (05) Reallocated sector count 92 92 294 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15689 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 46 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1085 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1085 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 158915035170 (C4) Reallocation count 86 86 406 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.4% Very good	Read 127 Write 139 Mixed 122 97% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.2 83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965439-093.A00LF 3x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 3 of 16 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 8.1 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W2600CR Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Intel W2600CR

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 01stBench 62%, 884 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	6x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	4x
RX Vega-64AMD $400Bench 87%, 91,676 samples	2x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
SSDSC2BA400G3 400GBIntelBench 87%, 389 samples	2x

RAM
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 16x16GBMicronBench 96%, 54 samples	9x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 16x8GBSamsungBench 94%, 85 samples	3x
M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 M393B5170EH1-CH9 32GBSamsungBench 44%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 160% - Outstanding

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16