Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Packardbell EasyNote LS13HR (all builds)
Motherboard	PackardBell JE70_HR
Memory	1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '20 at 12:52
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 136 61% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 269 33% 251 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 050E) 2GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	4.74% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 5.3 5% 5.9 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 4.9 4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.74% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Viperteq VT-SSDG550-480 480GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 143 89 87 87 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 421 Write 287 Mixed 272 SusWrite 129 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 15.2 62% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 17.4 DQ Mixed 24.8 35% 68.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 6GB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.3% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 13.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16