Alienware Area-51m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlienware Area-51m  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware Area-51m
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 03:22
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,156
108% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,550
96% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.7% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.8
48% 59.7 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1780 1783 1785 1797 1609 1440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 1,627
Write 2,009
Mixed 1,413
SusWrite 1,699
381% 1,687 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 85.5
281% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 1106
DQ Mixed 1,162
878% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 309%
Great: 431%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1955 1734 1720 1740 1160 1174 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1509
Write 2,067
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 1,580
374% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65.7
221% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1011
759% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 271%
Great: 347%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 482 482 484 480 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 430
Mixed 404
SusWrite 481
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 44.9
146% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 320
241% 323 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
WD Game Drive 1TB
881GB free
Firmware: 1003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 759 757 762 764 764 765 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 88%
WD Game Drive 8TB
5TB free, PID 2631
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 254 261 261 259 258 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 255
Write 267
Mixed 144
SusWrite 260
312% 232 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1.5
378% 4.53 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 4.8
DQ Mixed 1.8
228% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 123%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 80AD000080AD HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 859B0000802C BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 80AD000080AD HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 27.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area-51m Builds (Compare 542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Alienware Area-51m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $405
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback