HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3566
Memory0.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120515
Uptime20.7 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 17:56
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3000M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Memory 42.3
1-Core 20.8
2-Core 21.8
21% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 29.6
8-Core 39.6
4% 34.6 Pts
64-Core 25
2% 25 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6380G
HP(103C 3566) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 16 13 19 22 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 25
Write 13.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 21.6
15% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 0.8
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback