Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory43 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201214
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 05:33
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 306
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,111
102% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,591
98% 1,591 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 202
Parallax 214
182% 213 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 151
Splatting 133
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW010T9 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 1227 1457 1487 1464 1494 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,661
Write 1,416
Mixed 1,175
SusWrite 1379
316% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 66.8
225% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 613
529% 779 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 259%
Great: 295%
Seagate FireCuda 120 SSD ZA2000GM10001 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SU0SC011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 420 477 478 475 479 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 482
Mixed 470
SusWrite 453
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 46.1
152% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 112%
Great: 136%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
662GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 164 164 165 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 150
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 163
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6.8 13 13 13 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Read 27.1
Write 7.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 10.2
18% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GTZRX 04CD F4-3200C16-16GTZRX 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 24.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 26.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 2,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback