Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 143
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 372
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 46.1
29% 39.6 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 26.5
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 220 108 6.8 5.9 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 243
Write 211
Mixed 214
SusWrite 104
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 11.7
45% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 20.1
24% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 92%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 108 108 106 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 106
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 75%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 26.6
Write 21
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 24.2
31% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Corsair VS2GB1333D3 Corsair VS2GB1333D3 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback