Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 149
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 351
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 43.9
29% 39.4 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 26.5
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 44 214 103 6.8 5.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.7% Below average
Read 214
Write 203
Mixed 196
SusWrite 83.1
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 12.5
48% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 81.1
DQ Write 24.4
DQ Mixed 19.2
23% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 92%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 106 105 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 106
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 75%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 24
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 24.9
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Corsair VS2GB1333D3 Corsair VS2GB1333D3 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback