Dell Latitude E6410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude E6410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 04373Y
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 14:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 106
48% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 157
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 160GB (2010)-$50
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 62 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 62.9
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 61.7
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA MK6021GAS 60GB
27GB free, PID 8818
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Read 18
Write 17.4
Mixed 15
SusWrite 17.2
23% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback