Asrock X79 Extreme11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme11  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 14:13
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 654
70% 559 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 3058 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 456GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 390 449 424 394 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 554
Write 268
Mixed 398
SusWrite 406
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 36.1
138% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 285
219% 297 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 168 162 161 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 167
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 163
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
209% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 194 193 194 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 135%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 164 163 162 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 120
Mixed 85
SusWrite 162
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 98%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
26GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 15.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 18
23% 17 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
91% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 20%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB
123GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 270 272 272 271 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 360
Write 360
Mixed 316
SusWrite 285
446% 330 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 33.6
3,043% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 67.3
DQ Mixed 36.7
3,642% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 285%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 49.6
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 118%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme11 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback