Asrock X79 Extreme11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme11  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 741
74% 604 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 3023 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 456GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 247 255 235 258 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 908
Write 422
Mixed 404
SusWrite 248
109% 496 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 40.1
143% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 326
250% 336 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 166 161 161 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 170
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 163
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST12000NM0007-2A1101 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 190 192 193 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 192
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 192
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 135%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 139 142 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 144
Write 130
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 140
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 98%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
26GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 19
Write 15.3
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 18.1
23% 17 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
89% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 20%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB
123GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 272 272 270 268 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 367
Mixed 339
SusWrite 286
460% 341 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 32.4
3,069% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 33.5
3,523% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 291%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 49.6
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 117%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme11 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback