Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 13:22
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 287
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 531
68% 517 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 117
Parallax 105
96% 113 fps
MRender 92.3
Gravity 109
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,333
Write 1,138
Mixed 1,149
338% 1,540 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 77.8
252% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,209
DQ Mixed 995
778% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
70GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 369 454 243 246 324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 340
Write 267
Mixed 357
SusWrite 325
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 39.1
142% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 326
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 99%
SanDisk SSD 256GB-$150
143GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 272 317 325 333 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 416
Write 298
Mixed 129
SusWrite 302
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 10.6
48% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 14.1
13% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%
SABRENT 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: RKT303.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1507 1406 903 892 906 885 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
492GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 86 102 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 128
Write 33.5
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 101
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 75%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
118GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 41.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 36.6
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
87GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 61 60 63 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 48
Write 32.6
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 60.3
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 99 97 101 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 101
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 101
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $523
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback