MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime7 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 12:04
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 613
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 851A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 62.6
51% 64.9 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 54.8
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 217 216 215 217 217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 464
Mixed 397
SusWrite 216
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 47.8
162% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 4 512GB-$349
431GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 211 213 214 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 348
Write 439
Mixed 302
SusWrite 213
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 35.1
132% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 310
232% 309 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 108%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270
992GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 161 161 161 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 104
Write 174
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 161
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
296% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 118%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 12TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 194 197 197 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 208
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 195
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.1
294% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 114%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$139
412GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 105 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 99
Write 78
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 104
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
402% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 111%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
227GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 80 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 71
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 81.4
85% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 44%
LaCie Mobile Drive 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 10c5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 128 128 128 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 130
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 129
150% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 25
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 21.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback