Acer Swift SF314-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-41  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Strongbow_PK
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 10:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 176
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 502
49% 404 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1378) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.26
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.58% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 12
Parallax 16.8
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 13
Splatting 11.1
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 298 302 279 268 258 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,005
Write 355
Mixed 616
SusWrite 303
126% 570 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 42.3
140% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 271
238% 363 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 120%
Great: 153%
WDC WD25 00BEVT-22ZCT0 250GB
115GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 31.5
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 30.9
41% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-41 Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback