Lenovo 10AGA0EQFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10AGA0EQFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 18:38
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 202
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 515
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 132
Parallax 137
99% 130 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 125
Splatting 110
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 37 67 73 59 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 458
Write 393
Mixed 396
SusWrite 112
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 27.8
119% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 31.7
35% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
218GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 423 428 455 440 446 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 450
Write 434
Mixed 385
SusWrite 430
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 45.5
157% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42.7
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 59.8
51% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 117%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
319GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 117 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 117
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 14.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback