Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 11:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 185
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 434
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 6.4
4% 9.5 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.6
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 310 325 325 324 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 865
Write 1,060
Mixed 425
SusWrite 342
151% 673 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 59.4
83% 22 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
457GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 94 71 84 76 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 2
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 81.5
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 70%
OWC Envoy 500GB
277GB free, PID 338a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 38.2
Write 32
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 38.7
48% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 10.3
855% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 12.9
1,046% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 161%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.2
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 26.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback