Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 174 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 346 40% 314 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 31 33 33 35 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 3,420 Write 34.5 Mixed 70 SusWrite 32 185% 889 MB/s	4K Read 397 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 4.7 609% 135 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 234%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 108GB free Firmware: LCM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 50 55 57 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 45.5 Write 66.3 Mixed 47 SusWrite 53.5 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 2x8GB 6,014 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.5% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 16.4 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	4,197x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,750x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	999x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	621x
MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 171%, 6,569 samples	429x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	357x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	987x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	895x
RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 6,014 samples	588x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16