MSI MS-1795

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GL72 6QF
MotherboardMSI MS-1795  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 18:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 169
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 308
45% 329 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 115B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5164
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.4
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 8.5
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KINGSTON 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 262 271 298 300 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 315
Mixed 304
SusWrite 286
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 40.1
153% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 143
137% 213 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 120 122 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 123
68% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1795 Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1795

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback