HP ProLiant BL620c G7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant BL620c G7  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 16:53
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E7- 2870
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.6% Very good
Memory 97.5
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 136
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 496
46% 383 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 3685) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 924 MHz, MLim: 587 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.06
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 50.2
48% 56.3 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 47.2
36% 42.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 500GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 91.3
Write 30.3
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 30
31% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 32 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback