Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 211% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 203% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 15:22
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$249 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 155 2-Core 310 101% 186 Pts	4-Core 618 8-Core 1,188 107% 903 Pts	64-Core 1,208 75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% PNY(196E 136A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	207% Outstanding	Lighting 301 Reflection 299 Parallax 335 245% 312 fps	MRender 357 Gravity 260 Splatting 191 211% 269 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$199 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 270GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9,603 Write 8606 Mixed 8,907 2,017% 9,039 MB/s	4K Read 636 4K Write 275 4K Mixed 366 1,578% 425 MB/s	DQ Read 1,952 DQ Write 1,315 DQ Mixed 1,422 1,118% 1,563 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 310GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.6 0.7 1 1.4 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 479 Write 1.2 Mixed 2 SusWrite 0.8 25% 121 MB/s	4K Read 89.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 137% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 04CD F4-3000C16-8GISB 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 04CD F4-3000C16-8GISB 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 39.3 MC Mixed 30.9 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 42.8 SC Mixed 30.3 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,903x
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,622x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $284Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,315x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	655x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	643x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	864x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	570x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	493x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	285x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $112Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $1,306

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16