HP EliteBook 8530w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8530w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30E7
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 12:55
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$127
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 54
38% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 72.2
9% 70.3 Pts
64-Core 77.1
5% 77.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 770M
HP(103C 30E7) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.8
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 225 212 213 213 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.6% Good
Read 230
Write 246
Mixed 223
SusWrite 211
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 34.1
111% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 145
111% 149 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
258GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 71 71 73 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40% Average
Read 68.4
Write 65.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 70.8
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%
HP Photosmart Plus 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.44% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 3
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 3.2
5% 3.72 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 4%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 4GB
4GB free, PID 4060
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.8 0.4 2.7 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Read 5.9
Write 4.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 1.9
6% 4.28 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8530w Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8530w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback