Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 09:47
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	63% Good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 132 58% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 399 39% 322 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.2% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 80.3 46% 66.1 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 45.5 46% 58.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD SHS Computer 512GB M.2 2280 10 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0423A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 175 227 8.8 9.8 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 465 Write 383 Mixed 313 SusWrite 80.1 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.6 30% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 89%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 89GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 152 143 156 127 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 479 Write 441 Mixed 351 SusWrite 172 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 44.1 146% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 251 186% 244 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 324GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 69 71 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 81.9 Write 82.6 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 70.9 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 17.3 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	11x
GP-ASM2NE2256GTTDR 256GBGigabyteBench 158%, 4,456 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	24x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	8x
F3 DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 45%, 445 samples	7x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $315