Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 00:49
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 111
56% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 290
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 59.6
38% 50.8 fps
MRender 45.1
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 31.8
33% 41.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 68 53 57 78 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 432
Write 389
Mixed 325
SusWrite 97.1
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 23.4
79% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 162
150% 230 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
930GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 123 123 124 123 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 121
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4 F3-12800CL9-2 F3-12800CL9-4 F3-12800CL9-2 12GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback