MSI MS-17B1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS73VR 6RF
MotherboardMSI MS-17B1  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160726
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '17 at 14:13
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 149
46% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 529
49% 411 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 11AC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 4.69
5% 26.8 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 9
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 978
Mixed 1,237
299% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 56.6
191% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 140
138% 222 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 205%
Great: 207%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
906GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 21.1
Write 74.4
Mixed 34.1
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.01
5% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 9905663-007.A00G 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17B1 Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-17B1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback