Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 21:05
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 142
2-Core 276
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 771
77% 626 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 123
Parallax 119
98% 121 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 126
Splatting 109
92% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 98 99 96 91 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 144
Mixed 164
SusWrite 100
29% 126 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 20.8
125% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 146
122% 176 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 66%
Corsair Force 3 60GB
37GB free
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 59 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 177
Write 66.5
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 60.6
22% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 33.9
118% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 81
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 69.1
53% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
35GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,476
Write 1241
Mixed 816
330% 1511 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 71
269% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 838
DQ Mixed 945
738% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 64GB
5GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 2.6 1.3 6.9 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 2.9
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 27.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 31.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $639
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback