Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 11:01
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 99
2-Core 196
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 722
63% 539 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 71
Parallax 62.9
51% 65.5 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 54.3
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 120GB-$80
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 24 152 22 147 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 370
Write 222
Mixed 247
SusWrite 86.9
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 35.6
129% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 192
148% 202 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 86%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
235GB free
Firmware: 4C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 71 73 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 82.4
Write 80.1
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 70.2
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
206GB free
Firmware: 4C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 86 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 85.8
Write 85.2
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 84.3
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter R748G2400U2S 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.4% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback