Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 23:14
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 772
78% 635 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 113
Parallax 103
86% 107 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 106
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 329 326 323 322 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 1,217
Mixed 574
SusWrite 370
204% 918 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.7
208% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 663
548% 793 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 186%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
302GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 478 481 483 439 345 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 487
Mixed 456
SusWrite 450
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 62.1
205% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
259GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 478 481 484 424 283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 487
Mixed 466
SusWrite 438
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 56.5
189% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
48GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 296 294 297 298 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 481
Mixed 412
SusWrite 316
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 58.4
194% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$32
266GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FADG BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FADG 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.4% Very good
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 25.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,173
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback