Gigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00 (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 960 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 20:15
Run Duration	96 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5557M APU 571 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 61.9 37% 53.9 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 101 14% 101 Pts	64-Core 98.8 6% 98.8 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SMS200S3120G 120GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 7512089 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -117020678946391 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 514 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 43 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 68 74 137443803204 (C2) HDA temperature 68 74 137443803204 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7512089 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7512089 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7512089 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 749 (EA) Unknown 0 0 893 (F1) Unknown 0 0 893 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2033 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1376261	51.2% Above average	Read 470 Write 182 Mixed 188 61% 280 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 9.97 65% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 46.6 38% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 74%
Toshiba HDWJ110 1TB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 772GB free Firmware: AX1P Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1670 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 784 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 389 (0A) Spinup retry count 115 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 513 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 301 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3168 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 141734903832 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 36 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 267 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	52.9% Above average	Read 101 Write 83.1 Mixed 86.7 68% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.19 69% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28% Poor	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 10.5 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.4 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-M1M3XBP-00

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)