Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 167 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 217 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 153 96 6.9 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 394 Write 152 Mixed 170 SusWrite 95.8 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 14.9 62% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 52.1 63% 109 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 85%
WDC WD32 00BEKT-60PVMT0 320GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 40GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 34 35 34 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 36 Write 31.5 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 33.9 42% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 04CB AM1L16BC4R1-B1PS 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.8 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	403x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	102x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	16x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	22x
16JTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 458 samples	15x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	14x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $247

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16