Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 42.8 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 146 37% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 212 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 101GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 56 55 53 54 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 350 Write 338 Mixed 222 SusWrite 88.2 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 17.2 77% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 120 115% 176 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 73 44 37 39 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 37.7 Write 101 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 55.6 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	127x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	66x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	40x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	28x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16