HP 550-165ng

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 550-165ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B2C
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 11:52
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 234
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 602
65% 518 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 38.3
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 1TB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 114 81 43 74 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 362
Write 346
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 113
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.5
25% 7.37 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 0.6
67% 157 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 77 82 86 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 39.2
Write 80.7
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 82.4
52% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.4
173% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
521GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 91 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 97.7
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 91.4
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 109%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
36GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 56.1
Write 58.9
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 43.4
63% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 30%
Samsung G3 Station 1TB
769GB free, PID 6012
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 24 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 14.2
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 24.6
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
85GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 84.7
Write 87.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 83.5
92% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-073.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback