PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP 550-165ng (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 2B2C |
Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151110 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 25 '20 at 11:20 |
Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingdian S280 1TB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 96 73 44 74 74 MB/s
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 79 82 86 88 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
53.3%
Above average
|
||||
ST950032 5AS 500GB
36GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
|
20.5%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung G3 Station 1TB
769GB free, PID 6012
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 24 23 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
85GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 83 83 84 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905471-073.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds