TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '15 at 01:04
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 123
42% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 231
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 64.5
39% 48.7 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 42.1
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 37.7%
 Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 251GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 341
Write 487
Mixed 269
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 5.41
31% 9.91 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 5.15
6% 9.52 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 53.1%
 Great: 95%
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$60
224GB free
Firmware: SD03
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 17.4
Mixed 20.7
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.25
58% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 10.5%
 Great: 37%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD  $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples12x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD  $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples11x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD  $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples10x
GPU
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples9x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples9x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples9x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples5x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples4x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX  $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples7x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples4x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 3,851 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback