Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140731
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '15 at 06:56
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 120
41% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 225
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1002.0
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 60.6
39% 47.3 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 41.8
34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 251GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 658
Write 110
Mixed 90.8
61% 286 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 6.64
36% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 16.5
12% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 95%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
422GB free
Firmware: CR10
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 41.5
Mixed 51.7
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.26
68% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 44%
Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback