Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 144 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 186 28% 201 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,365 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM06D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 163 220 212 201 187 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 210 Write 197 Mixed 114 SusWrite 200 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 11.2 47% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 41.7 DQ Mixed 21.6 32% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 50%
Seagate ST9250311CS 250GB 976 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 232GB free Firmware: SC1D SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 75 75 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 61.3 Write 77.1 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 75.6 47% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 14.5 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,634x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	358x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	158x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16