Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 184
76% 127 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 498
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gainward(10B0 1183) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 41.7
24% 33.8 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 30.6
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 126 127 123 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.2% Above average
Read 275
Write 162
Mixed 188
SusWrite 129
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 26.5
84% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 165
133% 190 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
124GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 213 208 108 108 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 314
Write 316
Mixed 284
SusWrite 161
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 35.5
120% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 218
165% 223 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
659GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 128 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
737GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 145 146 145 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 155
Write 133
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 145
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback