Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 09:28
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 146
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 412
40% 327 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gainward(10B0 1183) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 40.7
24% 33.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 29.7
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 152
Write 45.3
Mixed 58.7
19% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 15.2
64% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 166
120% 158 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
142GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 305 176 151 148 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 309
Write 315
Mixed 272
SusWrite 204
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 34.3
114% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 219
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$33
700GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 122 124 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 139
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 123
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$33
737GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 146 145 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 135
Mixed 93
SusWrite 145
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 108%
Lexar CF USB_3_0 Read 4GB
3GB free, PID b049
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
6.68% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 8.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 11.7
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.4
67% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,364
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback