Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161024
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '17 at 14:12
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Memory 92.1 1-Core 154 2-Core 309 101% 185 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 581 78% 585 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 74.1 Parallax 68.6 59% 71.7 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 69.1 Splatting 70 56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3642 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 434 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 53 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 47 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6733121943	81% Excellent	Read 514 Write 417 Mixed 418 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 25.2 99% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 85.7 DQ Mixed 45.8 51% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63 6,344 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1TB free Firmware: MKAOAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 84 (03) Spinup time 125 125 51580109418 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4129 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16047 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1922 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5319 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5319 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 253404053544 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	63% Good	Read 108 Write 112 Mixed 83.7 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 521GB free Firmware: MN6OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 86 (03) Spinup time 147 147 34387263849 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3051 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20433 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2769 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7760 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7760 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 223339282467 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 173	67.4% Good	Read 120 Write 115 Mixed 90 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.35 95% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.7% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 23.7 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 23.7 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $247Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	196x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	133x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	90x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	82x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	48x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $505

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16