Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 174 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 420 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 5003) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 3.8 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.7 fps	Gravity 2.3 Splatting 5.8 4% 4.05 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Eaget S606 SSD 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 31 31 29 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 378 Write 50.5 Mixed 65 SusWrite 31.3 28% 131 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 4.4 28% 8.37 MB/s	DQ Read 74.5 DQ Write 32.7 DQ Mixed 12.9 20% 40 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 1x8GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	156x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	131x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	118x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	38x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GBSamsungBench 242%, 17,400 samples	37x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	40x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	27x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	27x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16