Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive9.06% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '17 at 03:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 127
57% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7730
MSI(1462 2799) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.93
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 10.6
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 8.07
Splatting 11.9
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 250GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 64.2
Write 47.2
Mixed 55.5
12% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.93
4K Write 9.17
4K Mixed 1.78
12% 4.62 MB/s
DQ Read 2.99
DQ Write 8.72
DQ Mixed 1.54
2% 4.42 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 17%
Virtual Disk 219GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
Read 69.9
Write 37.4
Mixed 53.5
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.82
4K Write 7.14
4K Mixed 1.62
430% 3.86 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback