Asus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GU
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 00:34
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 240
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 771
72% 602 Pts
64-Core 949
59% 949 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 179F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5671
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.1% Good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 80.4
71% 86.9 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 71.2
66% 81.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 876
Write 1,170
Mixed 958
225% 1,001 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 55.3
184% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 721
548% 742 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
408GB free
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 115 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 127
Write 127
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 114
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
236% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 24.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GU_FX95GU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback