Asus P5KPL-AM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 10:07
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 25.4
2-Core 39.4
31% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 42.4
8-Core 51.6
6% 47 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 1.1
4% 3.87 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.2
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AVVS-63L2B0 160GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 46 13 31 58 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 63
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 42.3
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 44%
Spectra Flash 500GB
445GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1 0.9 1 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.77 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback