TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple MacBookPro16,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-5F9802EFE386AA28
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 23:22
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1068NG7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 275
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 655
72% 568 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 77.6%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 185
Parallax 209
146% 191 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 188
Splatting 126
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 130%
 Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP4096 4TB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1541 1730 1744 1796 1784 1787 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
2TB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 720 800 807 830 829 825 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,175
Write 579
Mixed 614
SusWrite 802
176% 792 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 61.3
196% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 325
285% 423 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑
This bench: 178%
 Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT53E2G32D8QD-053 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 38.9
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 22.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 116%
 Great: 116%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MacBookPro16,2 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro16,2

CPU
Core i5-1038NG7IntelBench 65%, 478 samples12x
Core i7-1068NG7IntelBench 68%, 173 samples3x
GPU
Iris Plus GraphicsIntelBench 14%, 462 samples13x
Radeon Pro 580AMDBench 49%, 743 samples1x
Radeon Pro 580XAMDBench 49%, 378 samples1x
SSD
Portable SSD T5 500GBSamsungBench 75%, 14,526 samples3x
PSSD T7 500GBSamsungBench 67%, 1,446 samples2x
Portable SSD T3 500GBSamsungBench 69%, 1,345 samples1x
RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples10x
MT53E2G32D8QD-053 2x16GBMicronBench 105%, 38 samples4x
H9HCNNNCPMALHR-NEE 2x8GBHynixBench 102%, 3,263 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback