Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive333% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 20:05
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 278
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 1,027
90% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 67
57% 70.2 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 66.2
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 775 869 858 848 860 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,590
Write 2,218
Mixed 1,568
SusWrite 853
403% 1,808 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 95.9
318% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,905
DQ Write 1,611
DQ Mixed 1,469
1,180% 1,662 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 333%
Great: 355%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
93GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 236 236 236 235 235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 427
Mixed 302
SusWrite 262
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 54.5
186% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 331
255% 347 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
863GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2365 2176 1187 1193 1187 1192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,419
Write 2,306
Mixed 1,469
SusWrite 1,550
434% 1,936 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 89.7
300% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,919
DQ Write 1,680
DQ Mixed 1,760
1,330% 1,786 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 364%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
915GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 175 181 179 179 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 188
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 177
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Intenso portable SSD 495GB
73GB free, PID 2910
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 111 96 103 94 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 187
Write 95.4
Mixed 181
SusWrite 108
185% 143 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
182% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 34.8
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 32.1
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,071
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback