TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 43.2
32% 43.6 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 51.7
10% 67.5 Pts
64-Core 77.2
5% 77.2 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 39.7%
 Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 21.5
13% 21.6 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 16
Splatting 24
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 14.5%
 Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 56 63 70 97 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 116
Mixed 57
SusWrite 78.4
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 53.2%
 Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.2 3.6 3.4 4 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 16.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 3.7
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 4.57%
 Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-046.A00LF 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.2
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 27.4%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD  $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples16x
A4-5300 APUAMD  $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples6x
A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD  $265Bench 48%, 6,606 samples3x
GPU
HD 7790AMDBench 20%, 8,590 samples12x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples5x
GTX 660Nvidia  $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples2x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples5x
PM830 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 54%, 663 samples4x
RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 40%, 643 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback